DELAWARE VALLEY COALITION PHILADELPHIA FRIENDS OF PHILADELPHIA INNOCENCE PROJECT

Philadelphia Front Page News Innocence Project Philly Presents: The Bloom Report Archive News Video

For Further Interest In The Bloom Report News And Justice Email frontpagenews1@yahoo.com

WELCOME! YOU'VE REACHED THE LARK AND BARKSDALE JUSTICE FIGHT WEBSITE

The Robert ("Sugar Bear") Lark Advisory Council Under The VSP Foundation Non-profit Phila.

The Robert ("Sugar Bear") Lark Advisory Council Under The VSP Foundation Non-profit Phila.
THE INNOCENCE PROJECT PHILLY... FOR ADULTS AND SCHOOL STUDENTS. JOIN US TODAY!

Van Stone Phila: Know Your Rights With Robert ("Sugar Bear") Lark Advisory Council Website/Exhibit

THE THIN BLUE LIE MOVIE

Robert "Sugar Bear" Lark was on death row for 38 years and remains in jail in the state of Pennsylvania. The events of an accused murder, trial, and conviction that put a man behind bars is not the story that is in the 'Thin Blue Lie' movie - a 2000 television film directed by Roger Young and starring Philadelphia Inquirer reporter Jonathan Neumann (Rob Morrow), who, along with his partner Phil Chadway (Randy Quaid), for exposing Philadelphia mayor Frank Rizzo (Paul Sorvino) and the Philadelphia Police Department for corruption (observing the years 1976-1978) is in the movie. It was released on August 13, 2000 on Showtime.
According to the articles, suspects were beaten and tortured in interrogation rooms, as well as in many cases murdered, in an effort to meet the high quota of criminal cases solved by Philadelphia detectives. Neumann and Chadway met extreme opposition from the police department, working amidst phone tappings, apartment ransackings, and threats of death and bodily harm.
However, the above-mentioned reference about the methods used by mayor Rizzo and the Philadelphia Police Department for corruption success is in the story (allegedly) that has been told in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Appellee, v. Robert LARK, Appellant case, 1985.
Throughout the movie, Neumann faced a number of ethical dilemmas. First, most of his colleagues did not think that he should pursue claims of torture and death from suspects and a few police even; the city's crime level was at an all-time low, and some people felt that to question Rizzo's police policies would put the city's safety in jeopardy. Second, when interviewing victims of police brutality, Neumann had to assure the frightened victims that they would not be harmed by talking to him, when in fact, they had been threatened by police and warned against talking to and/or cooperating with reporters - may result in repeated jail lockup or even their death. Third, Neumann had to find one or more detectives willing to essentially betray a fellow officers in order to substantiate his claims.
In the case of Robert Lark, aka Sugar Bear, from West Philly and North Philly Street-life upbringing, people felt that to question police polices, City of Philadelphia, district attorney policies, City of Philadelphia and court of common pleas judges polices, City of Philadelphia practices would put the city's safety in jeopardy.
And the cops, the DA and the judges have no remorse over (allegedly) framing an innocent man and almost getting him executed - ongoing, once again.

PHILLY LIVE PRESENTS:TALKSHOW-PODCAST DOING IN JAIL - YOUR HOST JANIS BARKSDALE/J. WILSON/V. STONE.

Van Stone Presents: The Super Heroes of The Last Q Show Be A Hero

Saturday, December 21, 2024

Philadelphia Front Page News Personal Injury Legal News In Brief: Pa. Court Denies Procedurally Deficient Request for Delay Damages in $4.1M Personal Injury Verdict forwarded by The Legal Intelligencer frontpagenews1@yahoo.com

Philadelphia Front Page News Personal Injury Legal News In Brief: Pa. Court Denies Procedurally Deficient Request for Delay Damages in $4.1M Personal Injury Verdict forwarded by The Legal Intelligencer frontpagenews1@yahoo.com

 

Above: Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 601 Commonwealth Ave #1600

The majority concluded Arreguin's request failed as she didn't comply with Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 238(c)'s holding that a motion for delayed damages must begin with a scripted notice.

In a matter of first impression, the Pennsylvania Superior Court shot down the plaintiff's request for delay $4 million in damages, finding her motion procedurally deficient.

In a Tuesday opinion, the Pennsylvania Superior Court denied Maria Esther Arreguin's attempts to appeal a trial court decision denying her motion for delay damages. The appellate court affirmed the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas' conclusion, citing Arreguin's failure to comply with Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 238(c), which says that a motion for delayed damages must begin with a scripted notice. Judge Megan Sullivan authored the opinion and was joined by Judge Alice B. Dubow. Judge Victor P. Stabile issued a dissenting opinion.

In Arreguin v. Kinsing, the majority affirmed the trial court's decision to deny Arreguin's motion as it didn't follow Rule 238(c)'s requirement that the motion begin with the notice: "You are hereby notified to file a written answer to the attached motion for delay damages within twenty days from the filing of the motion or the delay damages sought in the motion may be added to the verdict or decision against you."

For full story click here. 

 

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)