Van Stone Phila: Know Your Rights (With) Robert (Sugar Bear) Lark Advisory Council Phila./Exhibit
ROBERT LARK INNOCENCE PROJECT
WELCOME! YOU'VE REACHED THE LARK AND BARKSDALE JUSTICE FIGHT WEBSITE
The Robert ("Sugar Bear") Lark Advisory Council Under The VSP Foundation Non-profit Phila.
THE INNOCENCE PROJECT PHILLY... FOR ADULTS AND SCHOOL STUDENTS. JOIN US TODAY!
Van Stone Phila: Know Your Rights With Robert ("Sugar Bear") Lark Advisory Council Website/Exhibit
THE THIN BLUE LIE MOVIE
Robert "Sugar Bear" Lark was on death row for 38 years and remains in jail in the state of Pennsylvania. The events of an accused murder, trial, and conviction that put a man behind bars is not the story that is in the 'Thin Blue Lie' movie - a 2000 television film directed by Roger Young and starring Philadelphia Inquirer reporter Jonathan Neumann (Rob Morrow), who, along with his partner Phil Chadway (Randy Quaid), for exposing Philadelphia mayor Frank Rizzo (Paul Sorvino) and the Philadelphia Police Department for corruption (observing the years 1976-1978) is in the movie. It was released on August 13, 2000 on Showtime.
According to the articles, suspects were beaten and tortured in interrogation rooms, as well as in many cases murdered, in an effort to meet the high quota of criminal cases solved by Philadelphia detectives. Neumann and Chadway met extreme opposition from the police department, working amidst phone tappings, apartment ransackings, and threats of death and bodily harm.
However, the above-mentioned reference about the methods used by mayor Rizzo and the Philadelphia Police Department for corruption success is in the story (allegedly) that has been told in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Appellee, v. Robert LARK, Appellant case, 1985.
Throughout the movie, Neumann faced a number of ethical dilemmas. First, most of his colleagues did not think that he should pursue claims of torture and death from suspects and a few police even; the city's crime level was at an all-time low, and some people felt that to question Rizzo's police policies would put the city's safety in jeopardy. Second, when interviewing victims of police brutality, Neumann had to assure the frightened victims that they would not be harmed by talking to him, when in fact, they had been threatened by police and warned against talking to and/or cooperating with reporters - may result in repeated jail lockup or even their death. Third, Neumann had to find one or more detectives willing to essentially betray a fellow officers in order to substantiate his claims.
In the case of Robert Lark, aka Sugar Bear, from West Philly and North Philly Street-life upbringing, people felt that to question police polices, City of Philadelphia, district attorney policies, City of Philadelphia and court of common pleas judges polices, City of Philadelphia practices would put the city's safety in jeopardy.
And the cops, the DA and the judges have no remorse over (allegedly) framing an innocent man and almost getting him executed - ongoing, once again.
PHILLY LIVE PRESENTS:TALKSHOW-PODCAST DOING IN JAIL - YOUR HOST JANIS BARKSDALE/J. WILSON/V. STONE.
Van Stone Presents: The Super Heroes of The Last Q Show Be A Hero
Van Stone 2024, native Philadelphian,
-(on assignment investigating the Com. v Lark 1988: Supreme Court of PA Murder
Trial) is an independent journalist working to free the wrongfully convicted By
Van Stone, Philadelphia Front Page News (610) 803-1624 frontpagenews1@yahoo.com
Philadelphia, PA - Van Stone is a Black American Independent broadcast friendly neighborhood reporter.
For years, investigative newspaper reporter and editor and
publisher Van Stone Downing has spearheaded news stories, podcasts and
investigative reports for the Philadelphia Front Page News newspaper and the
Philadelphia Westside Weekly newspaper. In 2024, September, a chance
conversation with a male younger sibling of Robert “Sugar Bear” Lark – Com. v
Lark 1988: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania murder trial - propelled Mr. Stone to
start probing wrongful convictions of Mr. Lark.
Robert “Sugar Bear” Lark has been labeled a notorious killer.
Imprisoned, thus far time spent is 44 years for crimes. He is was serving a
life sentence for murder and aggravated robbery.
Convicted… Yet the West Philly and North Philly senior
always maintains his innocence.
The above-mentioned work on criminal justice has led to a
podcast blended with culture starting in 2024 weeks later after a chance
conversation with a male younger sibling of Sugar Bear.
In addition, other
well-known writers and investigative journalist have joined Van Stone to
discuss his support of the “Robert Lark Innocence Project,” and why the issue
continues to motivate supporters to keep working to free the wrongfully
convicted.
Even with its status as a non-profit and educational
television broadcasting organization, Van Stone’s award-winning organization, the
VSP Foundation, engages in program education, providing radio and television
content and related services to its members, each of which together collectively
follow the media group.The VSP Foundation non-profit offers programming
local content such as news, interviews, cultural, and public affairs programs
for its individual volunteers, or sponsors and donors that agree with content
provided by VSP Foundation and other broadcasters, editors and publishers.
Watch Van Stone Philadelphia news for daily, breaking and
live news, plus special coverage. We are home to Philadelphia Front Page News
newspaper, Power 88 FM Power WVSR 1360 Radio Station, Philly Funk Radio Station,
and Philly Live! Cali Live! Talk Show Podcast news half an hour, ranked top credible
and objective radio, TV and podcast news show.
To contact Van Stone or any of the investigators covering
the Com. v Lark case you may call Mr. Stone’s news desk at (610) 803-1624 or send
email to: vspfoundation@yahoo.com.
Philadelphia Front Page News News Report: Innocence Project Story - Robert Roberson, an Autistic Father Wrongfully Convicted and Sentenced to Death, Applies for Clemency (As written by Innocence Staff, New York)
Above: 12/19/23, Livingston, Texas: Robert Roberson photographed through
plexiglass at TDCJ Polunsky Unit. Ilana Panich-Linsman for The Innocence
Project.
Medical and scientific experts, bipartisan Texas lawmakers, advocates
for parental rights, autism organizations, best-selling novelist John
Grisham, lead detective Brian Wharton, innocence groups, the Texas
Catholic Conference of Bishops, and dozens of others urge Texas Pardons
Board to recommend, and Gov. Abbott to Grant, clemency.
Today, 34 eminent scientists and doctors, a bipartisan group of 84 Texas
legislators, 8 advocates for parental rights, 8 organizations that
advocate for people with Autism and their families, faith leaders,
innocence advocacy groups, former judges, 70 attorneys who have
represented people wrongfully accused of child abuse, and former lead
detective Brian Wharton, among others, filed letters in support of Robert Roberson’sclemency petition to the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and Governor Greg Abbott. (Exhibits 7, 15-23.)
The clemency petition, filed today, can be accessed, here
Letters from hundreds of supporters, filed as exhibits, here.
Mr. Roberson’s petition describes the new
medical and scientific evidence that his jury never heard showing that
no homicide occurred. Mr. Roberson’s two-year-old, chronically ill
daughter, Nikki, actually died of severe viral and bacterial pneumonia
that medical professionals missed in 2002, not because of any abuse. Her
illness progressed to sepsis and then septic shock, a process likely
precipitated by the dangerous respiratory-suppressing medications she
was prescribed during her last days, all of which has now been
established by detailed reports from highly qualified medical
specialists.
No court has been willing to consider three
new expert reports showing how Nikki died of pneumonia, proof that Mr.
Roberson is innocent of any crime.
The power of Mr. Roberson’s innocence claim
is attracting diverse and widespread support, including from
best-selling novelist John Grisham, who said, “This isn’t a case where
the system got the wrong guy, but rather one where no crime took place
at all. Something must be done to stop Robert’s execution. Governor
Abbott and the Board of Pardons and Paroles can prevent an irreparable
injustice by granting him clemency.”
Phila. Front Page News Brief - International Longshoremen Association Major Possible Strike On The Rise by Janis Barksdale And Van Stone frontpagenews1@yahoo.com (610) 803-1624
According to CNBC if ILA (INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN
ASSOCIATION) doesn't reach an agreement with the port's ownership there will be a major strike on October 1.
The union is looking for more in wages and, the union also opposes port automation and exclusive port contracts.
The union has not called on a strike since 1977 and Harold Daggett, president of ILA and the union's chief
negotiator has said "a strike is only 1 of a few weapons in our
arsenal...so if backed in a corner, we're not going to hesitate to
strike back".
His plan is motivated by the threat
of job losses from terminal automation.
If a strike takes place, it
will disrupt the national economy from New England to Texas weeks before
the presidential election.
Penn Suspends Amy Wax, Law Professor Accused of Making Racist Statements Reported By Van Stone, Phila. Front Page News/Westside Weekly frontpagenews1@yahoo.com
Above: Amy Wax, Law Professor U. Penn The accusations against the professor, who had invited a white nationalist to her class and said
that Black people and women were less intelligent, led students and
others to call for her to be fired.
The University of Pennsylvania is
suspending Amy Wax, a tenured law professor accused of making racist,
sexist and homophobic remarks, for a year with half pay. It is a
significant sanction but one that falls short of the firing that some
students wanted.
The university issued
a “public letter of reprimand” to Dr. Wax describing the terms of her
suspension, which will begin in the fall of 2025 and which also includes
the loss of her named chair and the loss of summer pay in perpetuity.
Disciplinary
proceedings against Dr. Wax tested the tenure protections of professors
and whether such protections allow them to voice opinions that might be
seen asinappropriate or
downright insulting. Many students said that they could not trust Dr.
Wax to grade students without bias. But many professors — even those who
found her comments profoundly racist — objected to disciplining her, on
the grounds of academic freedom.
Among allegations against her were that she had described some non-Western countries as “shitholes” and had said that
“women, on average, are less knowledgeable than men.” She has said that
Black people from the United States and people from non-Western
countries feel shame for the “outsized achievements and contributions”
of Western people, and has derided as unrealistic television ads
depicting “Black men married to white women in an upper-class
picket-fence house.”
Dr. Wax denied making some of the comments and said that others were taken out of context.
In a 12-page complaint filed in 2023,
Theodore Ruger, the law school dean at the time, wrote that Dr. Wax had
demonstrated “callous and flagrant disregard” for students, faculty and
staff, subjecting them to “intentional and incessant racist, sexist,
xenophobic and homophobic actions and statements.”
Her
statements, the complaint added, “have led students and faculty to
reasonably believe they will be subjected to discriminatory animus if
they come into contact with her.” Mr. Ruger declined to comment on
Monday.
Dr. Wax declined to comment on
the decision. She has previously warned that she will sue the
university if she is disciplined. A lawyer for Dr. Wax, David J.
Shapiro, also declined to comment.
For
several free speech groups, the case represented a threat to one of the
key tenets of academic tenure — the right of faculty members to speak
freely, without fear of punishment, whether in public or in the
classroom.
Reacting to the suspension,
Alex Morey, an official with the Foundation for Individual Rights and
Expression, a free speech group, said that Penn’s decision “should send a
chill down the spine of every faculty member, not just at Penn but at
every private institution around the country.”
Ms.
Morey, the group’s director of campus rights advocacy, argued that Penn
had altered its customary disciplinary procedure to prosecute Dr. Wax.
She added that she was gratified that Penn had not revoked Dr. Wax’s
tenure — an indication, she said, of how flimsy the accusations were.
Peter
Wood, president of the conservative-leaning National Association of
Scholars, where Dr. Wax serves on the board, accused the university of a
“serious error of judgment.”
“Professor
Wax’s various statements on race, gender, ethnicity, immigration,
inculturation and other matters were entirely within the zone of
academic freedom,” he said, predicting that Dr. Wax would not “back
down.”
The
long-running disciplinary case had gone before a faculty hearing
committee. The university’s hearing board has said it does not dispute
that academic freedom protects Dr. Wax’s speech, but said that she had
violated “behavioral professional norms” in the way she presented her
views.
The reprimand letter to Dr.
Wax, dated Sept. 24 and signed by the university’s provost, John L.
Jackson Jr., said that while academic freedom should be “very broad,”
professors must conduct themselves “in a manner that conveys a
willingness to assess all students fairly.”
It
said Dr. Wax’s conduct had included making “sweeping generalizations
about groups by race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation and
immigration status. It also said that she had breached “the requirement
that student grades be kept private by publicly speaking about the
grades of law students by race, and continuing to do so even after being
cautioned by the dean that it was a violation of university policy.”
The
letter said that the university’s interim president, J. Larry Jameson,
had confirmed the decision to suspend Dr. Wax. Because the academic year
has already started, the suspension, which was first disclosed by The
Philadelphia Inquirer, will not begin until next fall.
The
letter also said that, in future public appearances, Dr. Wax must say
that she was speaking for herself and not on behalf of the university.
Martha Richards Conley, Black Female Lawyers/Attorneys Made Visits To Robert "Sugar Bear" Lark, By Janis Barksdale and Van Stone, Phila. Front Page News frontpagenews1@yahoo.com (610) 803-1624
Above: Martha Richards Conley
To Whom It May Concern:
I began visiting Robert Lark
approximately 15 years ago as an Official Visitor for the Pennsylvania
Prison Society. We were introduced by my good friend David Demarest, a
Carnegie Mellon University Professor who is now deceased, but who had
been visiting him for many years before I started visiting. During
this time I have come to love and respect Robert. He is a unique
individual and has seen it as his mission to connect me with various
people around the country who share my interest in prison reform.
I always enjoyed my visits with Robert which were alway positive and even uplifting.
He has maintained a positive mind set in spite of almost thirty years
in solitary confinement. He would often send me greeting cards and news
clippings that he thought I might like or would interest me.
Robert
is a product of American Society and the circumstances he was born
into. He is not the same person he was in 1986. He deserves a second
chance at life outside the prison walls.
Nominated 2022 CNN Heroes, Robert "Sugar Bear" Lark - Nominated By Janis Barksdale, Founder/Pres Of Robert ("Sugar Bear") Lark Advisory Council Story By Van Stone Phila. Front Page News frontpagenews1@yahoo.com
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022, at 10:54 AM, Janis Barksdale wrote:
In
February 2014, I nominated Sugar Bear for the CNN Hero award. I knew it
was a long shot but as you know nothing beats a failure but a TRY.
In 2014, I was diagnosed with breast cancer and due to my treatments I lost my focus on this.
As
is his forte, he encouraged me to watch the CNN Hero awards last
night. There was a Hero by the name of Tyrique Glasgow from South
Philly. Due to the efforts he has put in place for the youth in South
Philly the murder rate has gone down. I hope to put him in touch with
our brother in Pittsburgh to help in that area. Below is a sample of
what I submitted in 2014. I did receive confirmation from CNN that they
received my application.
Name of
Nominee: Robert Lark AM4192
Phone Number
: 724-852-2902
Q In your own
words, why does your nominee deserve recognition as a CNN Hero?
A I'm not even sure this nomination will be accepted but I
must try. Robert Lark is on death row in PA but even on the row he spends most
of his time trying to help others. He has helped people get money to pay rent
get food, cars, jobs,medical care,computers and get released from prison. For
over 30 yrs while fighting for his release as an innocent he continues to help
others and never ask for anything for himself. His motto is when someone is
released even if its not him that means God is in the neighborhood. Sugar Bear
as he is known to his friends has helped people all over the world and has done
it all from death row.
QHow have your
nominee's efforts made a difference for the better?
A As a death row inmate he reads more than 7 papers a day and
misses nothing. He sends people information regarding their illness that will
help them, he gives other prisoners information that has helped them obtain
their freedom He has done so without the use of a computer. He was granted a
new trial in 2007 but has not been tried. He is a hero to all who know him and
he continues to encourage others through cards, letters and materials.
QIs there a
specific incident or turning point that motivated your nominee to take action?
A Life and the injustices that occur on a daily bases
motivates him to help people. No matter the race, religion or beliefs. Almost
every day I am commissioned by him to take information to someone he may not
know that will help them during a foreclosure; a job fair is in the
neighborhood or its sweeps month let this reporter know this is happening. A
business is failing let them know that this organization gives money to those
doing that kind of work.
QIs there
anything else that makes your nominee exceptional or unique?
A I have letters from all sorts of people he has helped and
encouraged over the years. Inmates, ex-inmates, politicians, lawyers, doctors,
authors, pastors, literacy agents and friends. In all of their correspondence
they all say he is compassionate, encouraging, intelligent, always optimistic,
full of life and never bitter. Sugar Bear is a person that does good for
without any hope of getting anything in return he does it because it’s the
right thing to do. He is a true Hero.
Q How will
being recognized as a CNN Hero further your nominee's cause?
A Sugar Bear is a different Hero. As a young boy he was
considered a modern day Robin Hood, taking care of 8 siblings and everyone in
the neighborhood that needed help. This nomination would not be about him but
about all those in prison unjustly.
Van Stone Phila: Know Your Rights - Robert (Sugar Bear) Lark Official Website - Join The Fight To Solve A Murder Mystery Case Since 1979
Welcome to the Exhibit:
The Robert (Sugar Bear) Lark Advisory Council.
Readers will find news about the Robert (Sugar Bear) Lark Advisory Council here at this news feed site.
Advisory councils provide specific guidance and oversight for boards of directors.
The advisory council provides tailored advice that focuses on specific
areas, such as technology, marketing, etc. Experienced advisory council
members provide technical advice and critical thinking in areas beyond
the board members’ typical fields of expertise.
Advisory councils - as officers - provide the members with
the latest solutions, trending techniques, and knowledge so the
organization stays competitive in its industry.
In other words, the council gives the members a fresh perspective on programmatic issues.
An advisory council can help an
organization execute a project from launch to completion. It might
include drafting project designs, developing competent teams, creating
budgets, and establishing the roles of a project’s stakeholders.
Additionally, an advisory council can
help the board evaluate risks and plan proactively to enhance
preparedness and resilience in the project. If risks do occur, the
organization will be well-positioned to tackle them accordingly.
The
council also helps the members manage projects to ensure progress and key
deadlines are met. That way, the organization can make informed
decisions and ensure the project remains on track with predetermined
goals.
An advisory council can act as the
organization’s advocate in the community it serves. Leveraging their
expertise and industry network, council members can help an organization
connect to a greater constituency.
For
example, organizations may appoint a county-specific advisory
council to provide in-market expertise and shed light on the local industry and political culture.
Alternatively,
some advisory councils support industry development by making new
introductions and acting on the organization’s behalf at social
functions and industry events.
Advisory councils conduct their own meetings, which should be effective for maximum productivity.
We
begin with a real life once upon a time story. But this is only the
beginning of a 'last death-penalty case' in the City of Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania.
Oh, and please join the membership if you
like. You may register at the top right of this website by filing out
the register info and then hit submit.
In Philly's 'last death-penalty case,' killer gets a life sentence instead: Story from Philly.com
Above left: Robert (Sugar Bear) Lark, 26 yrs-old. Above Right: Philadelphia Police Dept. detaining Robert (Sugar Bear) Lark. Asked whether to impose the death penalty, the jurors, who had already
found Robert Lark guilty of the 1979 murder, sent a note: "We are at a
deadlock."
On Nov. 7, Philadelphia elected a district attorney who pledged to take the death penalty off the table.
But
two days later, prosecutors asked a jury of Philadelphians to impose it
one last time — in the case of Robert Lark, a 63-year-old man who has
already spent more than three decades on death row for the 1979 murder
of 36-year-old Tae Bong Cho, at a take-out restaurant Cho owned in
North Philadelphia.
The
jurors, who had already found Lark guilty of the murder, sent a note
out to Judge Steven Geroff after just an hour of deliberations: “We are
at a deadlock. Nobody is budging, and there won’t be a unanimous
decision.”
That meant Geroff would have to sentence Lark instead — to the mandatory term of life in prison with no possibility of parole.
“It’s
obvious to me that you are quite a villain,” Geroff told Lark. Then, he
tacked 22½ to 45 more years in prison on to the life sentence, for a
series of related convictions on charges including terroristic threats
and kidnapping.
Lark
was first convicted of the crime in 1985. But that verdict was
overturned in federal court based on Lark’s claim that the prosecutor in
his trial had used race-based practices in jury selection. At an
evidentiary hearing, the prosecutor could not provide an explanation
other than race for striking three African-American jurors in the case.
Jury
selection for Lark’s new trial, which began Oct. 2, took more than a
week. In a death-penalty case, lawyers must select a pool of jurors who
state they’re willing and able to impose the harshest punishment the law
provides.
“Each
of you,” Assistant District Attorney Gail Fairman told the jury,
“looked inside of yourselves, and each of you stated, ‘Yes, we can do
this.’”
No one has been executed in Pennsylvania since 1999. Since 2015, Gov. Wolf has maintained a moratorium on executions.
The
standard penalty for first-degree murder in Pennsylvania is life in
prison, but aggravating factors can trigger the death sentence. The
prosecutors described two such factors. The first, they said, was that
Lark had murdered a witness. They said he killed Cho on Feb. 22, 1979,
because Cho was scheduled to testify in court the next morning that Lark
had robbed him at gunpoint two months earlier. Second, they said, Lark
qualified to be executed because of his significant criminal history,
which included the gunpoint robberies of a Strawbridge & Clothier
store clerk, of Cho, and of his own landlord.
“The crime was an affront to the justice system,” Fairman said.
Lark’s
lawyers presented mitigating factors: a childhood destroyed by his
mother’s drug addiction and neglect, and his stepfather’s violent abuse.
His
birth was a surprise to his 15-year-old mother, defense lawyer Regina
Coyne said. “In his first year of school, when he was 5 or 6, he went to
five different schools,” she said. “He was in survival mode.”
She
described rats and a leaking roof, vomit on the floor. She spoke of
foster homes where he was taken away from his siblings, and described
how he ran away from those placements and slept in cars, until he could
find his siblings and reunite them.
The
jury’s decision means Lark will move from death row — where for 32
years he has been kept in his cell for 23 hours a day, according to his
lawyer — into the general prison population.
Nonetheless,
Lark will appeal the verdict, according to his other lawyer James
Berardinelli, who said he had been prevented by the judge from
presenting key evidence, including a pattern of questionable behavior by
the police who investigated the case.
That, prosecutors noted, means prolonging the pain for Cho’s family as well.
Seeing
the case return to court, Assistant District Attorney Andrew
Notaristefano said, “brought back everything. They thought this was over
with, and then they had to relive it all over again.”
Roger Robbie® , the Lovable Raccoon by Van Stone supports your activity in the justice fight. You’re just 1 easy step away from registering to the Robert "Sugar Bear" Lark Advisory Council as well as the Lark and Barksdale Justice Fight. Your registration is a gift. Click on the image to go to visit the registration form page and put in your Information.
Contact Form: Use The Form Below To Register Or Contact Us About Media - News/Radio/TV Submissions
The Weather in Philadelphia Now!
JANIS BARKSDALE
Janis Barksdale, Founder/Pres. Member of Robert “Sugar Bear” Lark Advisory Council/ Member of Van Stone Productions (VSP) Foundation, News Reporter for the Phila. Front Page News newspaper and magazine, Talk Show Host for Phila. Radio Station, Internet Philly Funk Radio/Power WVSR1360. Click on the photo to go to the VSP Foundation website.
US Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Website
HOMICIDE FILES: Journal Philadelphia Inquirer Dated: (APRIL 24-27, 1977) ALLEGATIONS OF ILLEGAL INTERROGATIONS BY THE HOMICIDE DIVISION OF THE PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT ARE MADE; INTERVIEWS AND CASE ACCOUNTS ARE EXAMINED. Click on the image to visit the website.
Make A Donation To Our Innocence Projects And More! Become A Sponsor Too.
Click on the image to visit the donation page.
VAN STONE PRODUCTIONS FOUNDATION PHILADELPHIA WEBSITE
Click on the image to visit the VSP Foundation main website.
How America's justice system is rigged against...: Shared by Van Stone's Innocence Project Philly
Click on the image to listen to and watch the video to support the Innocence Project Philly.
Radio Talk Show: Philly Funk Radio Presents The Philly Live Show! YouTube & Facebook
Listen to and view the podcast. Click on the image to go to the Philly Funk Radio YouTube Channel Page.
Black Animation. Van Stone Presents: The Super Heroes of The Last Q Show - Be A Superhero!
Watch the film series online. Black Animation at its very best. From the Van Stone Safe Streets Philly Project. Super Heroes Roger Robbie the Safe Streets Raccoon Super Hero, With Super Heroes U7 And Shadai Chiropractra. Click on the image to visit the YouTube Channel.
WVSR/PHILLY FUNK RADIO IS ON AIR LIVE! CLICK ON THE IMAGE TO LISTEN
COURTFIGHTER: Foundation For Individual Rights In Courts
You know what it takes to be a Firefighter, don't you? But what does it take to be a Courtfighter? The "Courtfighter" is for correcting common errors in court order guidelines that have been signed by judge authority. And courtfighter is for correcting bullying that often lead to depression and then depression that may end up in bullycide (suicide). Do you believe that you may have experienced a problem in court, any court, but especially in Media Deco Courthouse or Philadelphia Court, and feel that something should be done about family law or criminal law and the judge? Take action. Support Courtfighters. Who are courtfighter you may wonder? Courtfighters are American Civil Liberty, Free Legal Aid (attornies at law) who may support your case. In Civil Law courts are required to obey all rules and laws of the court. Unfortunately though, very few elected judges follow the rules. Instead personal principals (opinions) are used by judges to make decisions. Decisions based on personal opinion are immediaetely harmful to children and adults and any community subjected to the will of an abusive judge. Submit a case. Volunteer to become a Courtfighter Friend for a Bully Free community. Post your message by clicking on the justice image above to go to WVSR/FPN/VSP Courtfighter® Group Register page to tell us about your court case. Join the Courtfighter Group today!
Black Animation. Van Stone Presents: Watch Scissor Seven Series Super Heroes
Watch the film series online. Black Animation at its very best. From the Van Stone Safe Streets Philly Project. Suggested Super Heroes. Super Heroes Scissor Seven and Friends. Click on the image to visit the Anime Channel.
News Brief - Phila. Front Page News Newspaper/Westside Weekly Newspaper
Click on the image to visit the newspaper website.
WVSR LIVE STREAM
Click on the Audio On Demand Button for WVSR Radio Broadcast Live and pre-recorded request and other options
PENNSYLVANIA JUDGE ABUSE: CHILDREN'S RIGHTS ISSUE
Click on the image to file a complaint for Pennsylvania Court Judges
.jpg)
Posts
