DELAWARE VALLEY COALITION PHILADELPHIA FRIENDS OF PHILADELPHIA INNOCENCE PROJECT

Philadelphia Front Page News Innocence Project Philly Presents: The Bloom Report Archive News Video

For Further Interest In The Bloom Report News And Justice Email frontpagenews1@yahoo.com

WELCOME! YOU'VE REACHED THE LARK AND BARKSDALE JUSTICE FIGHT WEBSITE

The Robert ("Sugar Bear") Lark Advisory Council Under The VSP Foundation Non-profit Phila.

The Robert ("Sugar Bear") Lark Advisory Council Under The VSP Foundation Non-profit Phila.
THE INNOCENCE PROJECT PHILLY... FOR ADULTS AND SCHOOL STUDENTS. JOIN US TODAY!

Van Stone Phila: Know Your Rights With Robert ("Sugar Bear") Lark Advisory Council Website/Exhibit

THE THIN BLUE LIE MOVIE

Robert "Sugar Bear" Lark was on death row for 38 years and remains in jail in the state of Pennsylvania. The events of an accused murder, trial, and conviction that put a man behind bars is not the story that is in the 'Thin Blue Lie' movie - a 2000 television film directed by Roger Young and starring Philadelphia Inquirer reporter Jonathan Neumann (Rob Morrow), who, along with his partner Phil Chadway (Randy Quaid), for exposing Philadelphia mayor Frank Rizzo (Paul Sorvino) and the Philadelphia Police Department for corruption (observing the years 1976-1978) is in the movie. It was released on August 13, 2000 on Showtime.
According to the articles, suspects were beaten and tortured in interrogation rooms, as well as in many cases murdered, in an effort to meet the high quota of criminal cases solved by Philadelphia detectives. Neumann and Chadway met extreme opposition from the police department, working amidst phone tappings, apartment ransackings, and threats of death and bodily harm.
However, the above-mentioned reference about the methods used by mayor Rizzo and the Philadelphia Police Department for corruption success is in the story (allegedly) that has been told in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Appellee, v. Robert LARK, Appellant case, 1985.
Throughout the movie, Neumann faced a number of ethical dilemmas. First, most of his colleagues did not think that he should pursue claims of torture and death from suspects and a few police even; the city's crime level was at an all-time low, and some people felt that to question Rizzo's police policies would put the city's safety in jeopardy. Second, when interviewing victims of police brutality, Neumann had to assure the frightened victims that they would not be harmed by talking to him, when in fact, they had been threatened by police and warned against talking to and/or cooperating with reporters - may result in repeated jail lockup or even their death. Third, Neumann had to find one or more detectives willing to essentially betray a fellow officers in order to substantiate his claims.
In the case of Robert Lark, aka Sugar Bear, from West Philly and North Philly Street-life upbringing, people felt that to question police polices, City of Philadelphia, district attorney policies, City of Philadelphia and court of common pleas judges polices, City of Philadelphia practices would put the city's safety in jeopardy.
And the cops, the DA and the judges have no remorse over (allegedly) framing an innocent man and almost getting him executed - ongoing, once again.

PHILLY LIVE PRESENTS:TALKSHOW-PODCAST DOING IN JAIL - YOUR HOST JANIS BARKSDALE/J. WILSON/V. STONE.

Van Stone Presents: The Super Heroes of The Last Q Show Be A Hero

Saturday, December 21, 2024

Philadelphia Front Page News Personal Injury Legal News In Brief: Why Choosing the Right Pennsylvania Personal Injury Law Firm Matters forwarded by personal injury attorney reporters frontpagenews1@yahoo.com

Philadelphia Front Page News Personal Injury Legal News In Brief: Why Choosing the Right Pennsylvania Personal Injury Law Firm Matters forwarded by personal injury attorney reporters frontpagenews1@yahoo.com

 

Above: Blind Justice and the Courts

In Pennsylvania, where 2021 saw 117,899 car accidents, including 1,230 fatalities—the highest in five years—the choice of a Pennsylvania personal injury law firm can significantly impact the outcome of your case. Choosing a trusted partner, such as personal injury attorneys serving Philadelphia County, Delaware County, etc., ensures that you have experienced legal representatives who understand the complexities of Pennsylvania’s accident landscape. 

The right firm will aggressively pursue your best interests, leveraging detailed accident analysis and legal expertise to secure the compensation you deserve

Here are some reasons why choosing the right personal injury law firm proves to be significant:

Expertise and Specialization

Personal injury law covers a range of situations, such as car accidents and medical malpractice cases, that require skills and expertise to navigate effectively. Law firms that focus on personal injury cases have the knowledge and experience to guide clients through these intricate legal matters and provide tailored advice based on their circumstances. 

An established legal firm specializing in personal injury cases can proficiently handle the complexities of processes. This level of knowledge frequently leads to favorable results for cases and offers reassurance to clients who trust their matters are being managed competently. 

Effective Communication

Open and honest communication between clients and their lawyers is crucial for a successful partnership. A distinguished law firm places importance on maintaining a straightforward conversation with clients to keep them updated on every step of the legal proceedings. By comprehending the details of their case, clients are equipped to make choices confidently. 

Consistent communication and quick replies to questions play a role in establishing trust between clients and their lawyers. This bond of trust is crucial for nurturing an attorney-client connection that can result in successful outcomes. Clear and timely communication also eases clients’ worries and allows them to concentrate on their healing process. 

Resource Availability

Having the proper resources is crucial for the outcome of a proceeding. Known legal firms typically have connections with professionals like doctors, accident investigators, and experts in reconstructive analysis, which can bolster a case with vital evidence and expert opinions. 

Established companies have the resources to effectively manage the research and paperwork needed for personal injury claims. This capability to collect and assess evidence increases the likelihood of securing an outcome through settlement or court decisions to the client’s advantage. 

Negotiation Skills

Negotiating agreements demands a level of finesse and know-how in the field of personal injury law. Legal practitioners are well-versed in negotiating with insurance companies to secure compensation for their clients, who may otherwise receive inadequate payouts under different circumstances. 

Seasoned lawyers are well-versed in the strategies used by insurance firms, enabling them to devise tactics that safeguard the interests of their clients. This ultimately results in advantageous settlements through skillful negotiation, thereby avoiding drawn-out legal disputes. 

Courtroom Experience

In some instances, legal issues are resolved outside of court. However, in some cases, they proceed to trial instead. Select a law firm that has experience in court to guarantee clients receive representation in these circumstances. Lawyers with experience in trials excel at presenting cases to a judge and jury, which enhances the chances of a favorable result. 

In the courtroom setting, a lawyer’s skills in presenting arguments and handling circumstances play a role in influencing the outcome of legal proceedings. Thus, this underscores the significance of choosing a reputable legal firm with a history of success in litigation matters. 

Client-Centric Approach

Law firms that prioritize clients’ needs and well-being adopt a client-centered approach when providing legal assistance services. They show empathy and understanding towards individuals going through injury cases by offering personalized attention to make them feel valued and supported during the proceedings. 

Companies that choose this method offer customized plans that match their clients’ objectives. This emphasis on requirements encourages a bond between lawyers and clients, leading to better representation and successful results. 

Conclusion

Choosing the right personal injury law firm holds significance in navigating legal matters successfully after an injury occurs. Elements, such as the skillfulness of professionals at communication and negotiation, along with their courtroom prowess, play a role in ensuring a positive outcome for your case. Individuals dealing with injury issues must dedicate time to selecting a law firm that meets their requirements. Opting for the firm can significantly influence the journey towards recovery, offering both guidance and emotional comfort throughout the challenging period.

 

Philadelphia Front Page News Personal Injury Legal News In Brief: Pa. Court Denies Procedurally Deficient Request for Delay Damages in $4.1M Personal Injury Verdict forwarded by The Legal Intelligencer frontpagenews1@yahoo.com

Philadelphia Front Page News Personal Injury Legal News In Brief: Pa. Court Denies Procedurally Deficient Request for Delay Damages in $4.1M Personal Injury Verdict forwarded by The Legal Intelligencer frontpagenews1@yahoo.com

 

Above: Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 601 Commonwealth Ave #1600

The majority concluded Arreguin's request failed as she didn't comply with Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 238(c)'s holding that a motion for delayed damages must begin with a scripted notice.

In a matter of first impression, the Pennsylvania Superior Court shot down the plaintiff's request for delay $4 million in damages, finding her motion procedurally deficient.

In a Tuesday opinion, the Pennsylvania Superior Court denied Maria Esther Arreguin's attempts to appeal a trial court decision denying her motion for delay damages. The appellate court affirmed the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas' conclusion, citing Arreguin's failure to comply with Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 238(c), which says that a motion for delayed damages must begin with a scripted notice. Judge Megan Sullivan authored the opinion and was joined by Judge Alice B. Dubow. Judge Victor P. Stabile issued a dissenting opinion.

In Arreguin v. Kinsing, the majority affirmed the trial court's decision to deny Arreguin's motion as it didn't follow Rule 238(c)'s requirement that the motion begin with the notice: "You are hereby notified to file a written answer to the attached motion for delay damages within twenty days from the filing of the motion or the delay damages sought in the motion may be added to the verdict or decision against you."

For full story click here. 

 

Wednesday, December 4, 2024

Philadelphia Front Page News Justice Brief: Federal judge accuses President Biden of attempting to 'rewrite history' in Hunter Biden pardon forwarded by Fox News frontpagenews1@yahoo.com

Philadelphia Front Page News Justice Brief: Federal judge accuses President Biden of attempting to 'rewrite history' in Hunter Biden pardon forwarded by  Fox News frontpagenews1@yahoo.com

 

Above: Hunter Biden.

The federal judge overseeing Hunter Biden’s tax case issued a sharp rebuke of President Biden's claim that his son was unfairly treated as well as the president's delivery method following the president's last-minute pardon.

U.S. District Judge Mark Scarsi, who is based in the Central District of California and was nominated by President-elect Trump, accused President Biden in a scathing five-page order of "rewriting history" with the pardon and suggested that the breadth of the pardon granted to his son is unconstitutional.

"The Constitution provides the President with broad authority to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, but nowhere does the Constitution give the President the authority to rewrite history," he wrote.

The judge voiced his displeasure that the president alerted the judicial system of his order to pardon his son via a White House press release.

"Rather than providing a true and correct copy of the pardon with the notice, Mr. Biden provided a hyperlink to a White House press release presenting a statement by the President regarding the pardon and the purported text of the pardon," he wrote.

"In short, a press release is not a pardon," he continued.

For full story click here.